To test the hypothesis that irrational relationship beliefs related to perceived parent-adolescent relations and conflict resolution behaviors, Pearson Moment Correlations were calculated. The correlations among scores on the ICDS, CRS, MRS, FRS are presented in Table 1. 06, p>.236) and father-adolescent relations (r = .07, p>.229). 23, p<.001). Result showed that Interpersonal Rejection subscale of ICDS had highest correlation with CRS (r = -.44, p<. 001).
The folks whose mediocre rating fell over the average was indeed branded due to the fact large dysfunctional matchmaking thinking category, and the ones having the average get underneath the average was labeled just like the lowest dysfunctional relationship beliefs classification
In this study, it was expected that individuals with high dysfunctional beliefs would endorse more less conflict resolution behaviors and perceive theft relations with parents negatively than those of low dysfunctional beliefs. To test this hypothesis, the high and low irrational group were defined by a median split on the ICDS score (median = ). Multivariate analysis airgprofielen of variances was performed to determine whether individuals having high irrational relationship beliefs vary from those not having irrational relationship beliefs across MRS, FRS and CRS. The result of analyses revealed that contrary to hypothesis, there was no significant group difference on mothers-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda = .971, F =.77, p>.696) and father-adolescent relations (Wilks’ Lambda=.967, F = .88, p>.578). Consistent with the prediction, significant group difference was found on conflict resolution behaviors (Wilks’ Lambda = .896, F = 4.12, p<.001). When compared to individuals with high irrational beliefs about relationships, individuals with low irrational beliefs endorsed significantly more conflict resolution behaviors. Subsequent univariate results indicated that differences between low and high dysfunctional relationship beliefs groups were significant on focing other's needs (F = 9.77, p<.001), social adaptation (F = 9.82, p<.001) and anger management subscales (F = 3.97, p<.020) of CRS (Table 2).
Sure-enough, negative and moderate peak connections ranging from dysfunctional relationship viewpoints and disagreement solution behaviors had been discovered (roentgen = –
Stepwise regression analyses was basically performed to examine things that expect thought parents-adolesents connections and disagreement solution behaviors as the oriented parameters. Separate parameters that were significantly less than data were intercourse, many years, style of quarters, parents matrimony, instructional amount of moms and dads, number of brother and you can sibling therefore the order out of beginning, family relations construction and dysfunctional relationship beliefs. So you can influence it is possible to independent details, basic, Beta weights have been calculated on decide to try. The best contributing separate parameters with the dependent variable difference was basically included studies. Procedure try ended just after including all independent details you to donate to the fresh new explained variance. Because the intercourse, educational amount of parents and type from household was categorical, these people were included into regression studies once getting dummy coded (0 or 1).
Beta weights showed that beliefs about interpersonal rejection was the most significant predictor for conflict resolution behaviors. Results also showed that gender and the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were predictors of conflict resolution behaviors. Stepwise regression analysis to determine the best model in predicting for conflict resolution behaviors was completed in three stages. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection was entered in Step 1. The contribution of beliefs about interpersonal rejection was statistically significant, accounting for 20 % of the total variances, F = , p< .001. When gender was entered into the equation in Step 2, explained variance of CRS increased to 27 % from 20 %, F = , p< .001. Gender difference was found between men and women on conflict resolution behaviors. Women had significantly higher scores than men in CRS scores (t = 5.05, p<. 001).
In Step 3, the beliefs about interpersonal misperception were included and this variable explained 3 % of the variance, F = , p< .001. The beliefs about interpersonal rejection, interpersonal misperception and gender accounted for 31% of the variance.