‘A REAL LESBIAN WOULDN’T TOUCH A BISEXUAL WITH A BARGEPOLE’

‘A REAL LESBIAN WOULDN’T TOUCH A BISEXUAL WITH A BARGEPOLE’

Contesting boundaries within the construction of collective identification. Abstract

Drawn from a study of this construction of collective identification in DIVA mag between 1994 and 2004, this short article considers the discursive contestation associated with boundaries necessarily, however never ever straightforwardly, erected along the way. Analysing first a variety of articles and 2nd (and much more significantly) debates about who ‘we’ have been in and between visitors’ letters, this article centers on the ‘trouble’ posed by bisexuality in this period. Visitors draw on and competition a cluster of interrelated characterisations of bisexuals: as undecided, as being type of pollutant, so when insufficient facsimiles of ‘real lesbians’, as well as just about available characterisations of ‘us’. These arguments are fundamentally handled editorially, and constantly ‘end’ with telephone calls for acceptance. This will not completely recover the ambiguity with which bisexuality is managed, nevertheless, as well as the article concludes by speaking about the dilemma(s) faced because of the imagined community.

Introduction

The work provided right here originates from a study of this construction of collective identification in DIVA, Britain’s very first conventional commercial lesbian mag, in its very first a decade in publications (1994 2004). Somewhat, DIVA continues to be the actual only real commercially successful, nationally distributed magazine that is lesbian 1 celebrating in 2014 its twentieth birthday celebration, an unprecedented milestone for the lesbian magazine when you look at the UK, commercial or perhaps. Where other games (Arena Three into the 1960s and 1970s, and Sappho when you look at the 1970s and 1980s see Turner, 2009 , to get more detail regarding the schedule of Uk lesbian publishing) more or less swiftly became the victims of circumstances both neighborhood and international, DIVA has survived in a time period of considerable social and change that is political. As a result, it really is a text whose close analysis is both crucial and satisfying 1st a decade, for which it discovered a foothold which had evaded its predecessors, especially therefore. DIVA arrived during the height of lesbian stylish, a trend that place lesbians everywhere and nowhere at one time (Turner, 2009 ), using the promise that even and particularly ‘regular dykes about city’ would get in its pages a house (Williams, 1994 , p. 4). Additionally looking to result in the publishing business Millivres Prowler a return on its investment, DIVA ended up being an enterprise that is unique more methods than one.

Regardless of this, it along with other lesbian magazines have actually gone mainly untouched by academics. Although we have actually considerable reports of females’s life style mags like Cosmopolitan (see, e.g. Chang, 2004 ; Machin & van Leeuwen, 2003 ; Machin & Thornborrow, 2003 ; McMahon, 1990 ; Ouellette, 1999 ) or teenage mags (Carpenter, 1998 ; Massoni, 2004 , 2006 ; Schlenker, Caron, & Halteman, 1998 ; have got all written about Seventeen alone), extremely work that is little been done on lesbian mags. Also without contrast towards the considerable literary works on ladies’ (and, considering that the very early 2000s, males’s) publications, your body of work addressing lesbian publications appears little. Koller ( 2008 ), Driver ( 2007 ) and Lewis ( 1997 ) consist of texts from lesbian publications within their studies (as well as in fact all consist of articles from DIVA), and many bigger scale studies of US homosexual and lesbian mags occur (see Cutler, 2003 ; Esterberg, 1990 ; Streitmatter, 1993 , and specially Sender, 2001 , 2003 , 2004 ), but no other researcher has scrutinised A uk lesbian mag with any comprehensive remit.

The analysis from where this analysis is taken had been largely inspired by a want to deal with this space inside our knowledge, and therefore a sizeable test, including all 95 dilemmas of DIVA published involving the launch problem in might 1994 that will 2004, had been opted for. This time around duration wasn’t therefore arbitrary a variety as it can appear; being the first ever to critically examine this text with an intention in discourses of identity needed the analysis of a considerable amount of manufacturing, and also this test allows a thorough diachronic analysis across a period of crucial social modification. It bridges two completely different years, a decade where the lesbian that is britishto utilize an inadequate but expedient construct) underwent significant alterations in regards to politics, legislation along with her presence in conventional news (cf. Turner, 2009 ). Generally speaking, desire to would be to create a synopsis of DIVA across ten years, explaining accurately the existence and/or absence of, or modifications to, specific traits regarding the mag’s content; to explore the contexts of the faculties; also to pursue a much deeper, hermeneutic analysis for the substance associated with magazine and its own (re)construction of lesbian identification.

Although the analysis presented in this specific article is predominantly discursive (see below for my way of the precise texts analysed), a blended technique approach had been taken, plus the conversation comes with insights garnered utilizing two extra and complementary practices: (quantitative) content analysis and (semi structured) interviews with key staff that is editorial. Content analysis ended up being carried out using each mag (coding kinds of content), each article (coding topic and individual reference) and every advertisement (coding item, regularity and size) whilst the device of research, permitting a types of ‘mapping’ of this test. The interviews, with founding editor Frances Williams, her successor Gillian Rodgerson, current deputy editor and number of years staff author Louise Carolin and Kim Watson, that is now Millivres’ news and advertising manager but served for several years in advertising product sales and advertising, had been directed by Chouliaraki and Fairclough’s ( 1999 , p. 62) advocacy of ethnographic work with discourse analytic tasks so that you can explore ‘the thinking, values and desires’ of participants. The interviews had been created as a way of learning more about the founding regarding the magazine, its staff (functions, routines and laws), the emotions of these in jobs of power, the imperatives lay out by the publisher plus the relationship between DIVA and its own readers.