The new motor problem is within the hands of the factory’s both motors have obtained a number of issues however these are increasingly being overcome, Austro gets the benefit of being a bit trailing Theilert and therefore keeps viewed a few of the conditions that Theilert have seen, on top of that the latest Theilert motor provides way more date floating around (a lot of they for the UAV’s) and very quickly have been in the right position to increase a few of the constant maintenance activities (the new clutch changes is always to in the future visit 600 times).
Their a very good flights
Off a processing views the new Thielert are a quicker complicated system additionally the pounds is a lot lower than the new Austro, I’d say that the newest Theilert weight virtue stability the newest Austro energy advantage.
At present into the system issue I can see no obvious virtue one-way or the most other among them Deisel engines, the thing I could state is the fact which have fuel costs increasing both of these motors can be more desirable.
I’ve had a great DA40-180 (AVGAS Letter-reg) for the past 24 months, thus are unable to help to the diesel working can cost you (even though FYI, 133ktas in the 8.3gph 8,000ft, 140ktas during the 9.0gph 4,000ft for the pricey AVGAS).
We have flown 6-prepare and G1000 and you can like the new G1000 – it is simply higher, especially IFR (in the event including VFR it will help much that have situational feel very a fast talk with the newest chart is all that is required, so spend a lot a shorter time lead off looking at an effective map guaranteeing your local area)
b) you actually would also like the latest GFC700 autopilot if you are planning so you can travel IFR – although don’t know if you possibly could get this towards DA40D (unsure in case it is recognized in the EASA-land). You will find flown together with other autopilots, but the GFC700 is actually method ahead of other people We have attempted – very an excellent, is entirely provided toward G1000 helping relieve workload when you need it i.elizabeth. if the criteria is bad (even yet in reasonable-major turbulence, where they flies very effortlessly and you may better).
The actual only real issue with these two is that there was a lot to discover – you really need to purchase plenty of time on the simulation away from Garmin.
nine instances flying over two days, is actually less expensive than a good way on an effective BA airline for each seat. Very flights having otherwise instead G1000.
But not, i travel toward fun and you may utility, if we travelled into economy however assume i won’t!
The newest jury has been out on the newest Austro toward situation in the event the cooler inflight restart and you can how to proceed in case the lso are-initiate fails, but that is problems which could perform a thread from the it is mind
personal see is its not slightly an equivalent package just like the the big end Us Sep technology, but is personal, and while this new motor trouble was basically solved stands for the best value for money.
Cirrus, Mooney, TB20s to mention a few clearly provide a quicker even more able to bundle – albeit at a high price and certainly with a much more expensive fuel shed. The DA42 compares with our even more 
favorably however, leaving out the new dual as opposed to unmarried argument the however perhaps not somewhat good a good.
The latest DA42 burns off almost the same fuel in the almost a similar sail speed once the my TB20 i.age. eleven USG/time during the 140kt IAS, no matter if however with the 42 this is basically the full power burn off both for motors.
The latest accuracy situation appears to be improving however, if or not a personal proprietor is also think about the system tech as “proven” following the debacles from decades early in the day, is an individual glance at. I’d like to get a hold of a few more age. Every DA42 private residents I understand was in fact extremely critical regarding Diamond’s handling of the problems and you will wouldn’t faith the business as much as they might place it.