Numerous users increased concern in the manner in which the brand new board fulfilling observe received on the fulfilling the spot where the long lasting appointment out-of Mr Hlaudi Motsoeneng since the COO taken place. Ms Geldenhuys is expected to your if or not she ever advised the latest board as to what legal consequences of their strategies while in the conferences. Ms Geldenhuys may declare that she is bullied during the group meetings but she nevertheless got email during the the lady disposal whereby she you will keeps informed the brand new board, even in the event it was after the fact. Even if she conceded so you’re able to knowing that means of appointment away from Mr Motsoeneng due to a letter of their attorney are procedurally incorrect, she did not provide good advice towards panel however, refuted one to she had done anything completely wrong once the she had not took part in flouting regulations. Ms Geldenhuys, whether or not claiming she ended up being bullied, rejected one to Mr Motsoeneng bullied their, alleging that it was low-executive board people, particularly Mr Krish Naidoo and you will Mr Nomvuyo Mhlakaza, that has bullied the girl.
He had been requested in the event the he considered the bucks invested of the SABC to be from the personal wallet; in the event that the guy directed elderly managers to trust which they do not account to people out-of SA; and you will in the his reference to Mr Motsoeneng
She replied that Minister got questioned a review of new actions from board participants and this she got stated with the lack of attendance and you will lack of cooperation amongst board players, however, it absolutely was never ever a study. The fresh Chairperson are unimpressed, and reminded Ms Geldenhuys you to she are significantly less than oath and you can responsible into the Board in terms of the Companies Operate, rather than brand new Minister. Ms Geldenhuys conceded you to she are a hundred% browbeaten because of the former SABC Board chairperson, Ms Ellen Tshabalala. MPs requested which faction of the board Ms Geldenhuys belonged so you’re able to, that she answered you to she is actually a separate person.
The brand new Chairperson reprimanded new SABC on its highest delegation saying that the newest Panel never wanted to find it happen again for the taxpayers’ money and you will classified it as fruitless and you can wasteful expenditure.
The fresh SABC panel chairperson, Prof Mbulaheni Maguvhe, searched and you will is expected for the his tries to stop or slow down the brand new parliamentary inquiry anywhere between their interdict app, this new refusal to incorporate data files, along with his walk-out from the eight December conference. He had been requested whom he thought was financial support their judge can cost you and who’d produced choice to see outside solicitors to behave on the behalf of the new panel in the event that panel did not have good quorum so you’re able to perception particularly a choice. He had been asked about the newest flouting of the ICASA governing for the the brand new SABC protest rules, the new non-quorate conference away from Ms Bessie Tugwana while the acting COO; if he voted on appointment from Mr Motsoeneng because the long lasting COO; from the disregarding brand new remedial step of your own Personal Protector and you can overlooking colleagues’ warnings from the contravening out-of policy and you may from the blurring the latest traces between your 
government together with board. He had been advised that witnesses before Committee complained one to they had been let down from the SABC, new Minister together with Panel, a lot of whom were fired, others away from just who was frozen unlawfully. He had been inquired about procurement put in both hands regarding Mr Motsoeneng, causing R100 mil being invested in the place of following the best procurement procedure.
Meeting declaration
Prof Bongani Khumalo: former SABC Panel member The new Chairperson established your basic witness might possibly be Prof Bongani Khumalo, former SABC Panel associate. The guy advised Prof Khumalo that he’s necessary for laws to respond to the questions legitimately place to help you your totally and you can satisfactorily. Concurrently, they are expected to write people asked files in connection with the niche matter of the newest inquiry, regardless of the fact that the clear answer or file you can expect to incriminate him or present him so you’re able to unlawful or municipal procedures or problems.