I found Swami Satchidananda’s version preciso be informative and somewhat blunt – and I mean that mediante per good way. He uses a few modern examples throughout the text puro help improve the reader’s understanding. This book was originally published sopra 1978 and the ed Personally, I’ve only read 2 others before reading this version, so my point of reference may be considered narrow.
I found Swami Satchidananda’s version puro be informative and somewhat blunt – and I mean that durante verso good way. He uses verso few modern examples throughout the text puro help improve the reader’s understanding. This book was originally published in 1978 and the examples he uses still apply (both ironic and sad).
I read one or two sutras before each yoga practice
His attempt preciso explain the overall concept of “never-ending consciousness” that is a key part of the spirituality of Yoga felt per bit incomplete, or at the very least, confusing. His use of the word God preciso symbolize said consciousness made it hard onesto distinguish between the Christian concept of God and the yogic concept of consciousness/God/Light . etc.
Swami summarizes and skips over indivisible sutras entirely within Books 3 & 4. Notably, these are the 2 of the 4 books that most authors summarize because they have less day-to-day useful knowledge, so his choice is common.
Personally, I am very happy that I took the time sicuro read this interpretation https://datingranking.net/it/tsdates-review/ of the Yoga Sutras and I’d widely recommend it puro others, especially those delving into the world of teaching Yoga. That being said, this isn’t per be-all end-all translation (per niente book is), so I implore you to read other Yoga Sutras commentaries as well. . more
After finally finishing it, I know I need to go back onesto it and study the sutras with some intensity. There is much wisdom bestowed in these pages, and there were many moments while reading, I gained clarity on the way I interact and respond with my environment.
Highly recommended for any devoted yoga practitioner, but also for those who are interested mediante asian philosophy. Although yoga is not defined by one religion, the influences of Hinduism per After finally finishing it, I know I need puro go back to it and study the sutras with some intensity. There is much wisdom bestowed sopra these pages, and there were many moments while reading, I gained clarity on the way I interact and respond with my environment.
If you are looking for verso complete commentary on the Yoga Sutras, this is not the book for you
Highly recommended for any devoted yoga practitioner, but also for those who are interested sopra asian philosophy. Although yoga is not defined by one religion, the influences of Hinduism and Buddhism are apparent. I liked how Satchidananda used present day examples preciso explain the sutras and did not hesitate esatto incorporate science. . more
Praise be! Read on time for the upcoming teacher preparazione weekend. Well worth the read per this context, some excellent teachings here (from 2000+ years spillo), and also some provocation – always good sicuro question rather than accept with blind faith. I understand there’s another version from per feminist perspective – I’ll search it out. Also, the expansion of final sutra of the final (4th) book reminded me of something I was told mediante Pikangikum one time, that I absolutely did not get, had onesto do with b Praise be! Read on time for the upcoming teacher allenamento weekend. Well worth the read mediante this context, some excellent teachings here (from 2000+ years ago), and also some provocation – always good esatto question rather than accept with blind faith. I understand there’s another version from per feminist perspective – I’ll search it out. Also, the expansion of final sutra of the final (4th) book reminded me of something I was told con Pikangikum one time, that I absolutely did not get, had preciso do with being in per particular state, where you were not responsible for your actions. Seeing it here sopra another context has me rethinking, but still not yet understanding. I wish I could go back esatto Pik. I suppose I can. A good topic for discussion.